📝 SummarXiv

Abstract

Existing research has yet to reach a consensus on whether and how small flying animals utilize elastic energy storage mechanisms to reduce flight energy expenditure, and there is a lack of systematic and universal methods for assessment. To address these gaps, this study proposes a method to evaluate elastic energy storage capacity based on wing kinematic parameters (flapping amplitude and flapping frequency), grounded in the hypothesis that animals tend to minimize flight energy expenditure. By establishing a simplified power model, the study calculates the optimal kinematic parameters corresponding to the minimum mechanical power requirements under two extreme conditions: no elastic energy storage and complete elastic energy storage. These optimal parameters are then compared with measured data from various small flying animals. The results show that the measured parameters of hummingbirds, ladybugs, and rhinoceros beetles are close to the no-storage optimum, indicating relatively weak elastic energy storage capacity; whereas hoverflies, bumblebees, and honeybees align closely with the complete-storage optimum, suggesting strong elastic energy storage ability. Furthermore, the wing kinematic adjustment strategies these animals employ in response to changes in load or air density are consistent with the predicted elastic storage capacities. This study provides a systematic new approach for assessing biological elastic energy storage capacity and offers a theoretical basis for the low-power design of flapping wing micro air vehicles.