📝 SummarXiv

Abstract

A seismic fragility curve expresses the probability of failure of a structure conditional to an intensity measure (IM) derived from seismic signals. When only limited data is available, the practitioner often refers to the probit-lognormal model coupled with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to obtain estimates of these curves. This means that only a binary indicator of the state (BIS) of the structure is known, namely a failure or non-failure state indicator, when it is subjected to a seismic signal with an intensity measure IM. In this context, the objective of this work is to propose a method for optimally estimating such curves by obtaining the most precise estimate possible with the minimum of data. The novelty of our work is twofold. First, we present and show how to mitigate the likelihood degeneracy problem which is ubiquitous with small data sets and hampers frequentist approaches such as MLE. Second, we propose a novel strategy for sequential design of experiments (DoE) that selects seismic signals from a large database of synthetic or real signals via their IM values, to be applied to structures to evaluate the corresponding BISs. This strategy relies on a criterion based on information theory in a Bayesian framework. It therefore aims to sequentially designate the IM value such that the pair (IM, BIS) has on average, with respect to the BIS of the structure, the greatest impact on the posterior distribution of the fragility curve. The methodology is applied to a case study from the nuclear industry. The results demonstrate its ability to efficiently and robustly estimate the fragility curve, and to avoid degeneracy even with a limited amount of data. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the estimates quickly reach the model bias induced by the probit-lognormal modeling. Eventually, two criteria are suggested to help the user stop the DoE algorithm.