Intuitions of Machine Learning Researchers about Transfer Learning for Medical Image Classification

Yucheng Lu, Hubert Dariusz Zając, Veronika Cheplygina, Amelia Jiménez-Sánchez

Published: 2025/10/1

Abstract

Transfer learning is crucial for medical imaging, yet the selection of source datasets - which can impact the generalizability of algorithms, and thus patient outcomes - often relies on researchers' intuition rather than systematic principles. This study investigates these decisions through a task-based survey with machine learning practitioners. Unlike prior work that benchmarks models and experimental setups, we take a human-centered HCI perspective on how practitioners select source datasets. Our findings indicate that choices are task-dependent and influenced by community practices, dataset properties, and computational (data embedding), or perceived visual or semantic similarity. However, similarity ratings and expected performance are not always aligned, challenging a traditional "more similar is better" view. Participants often used ambiguous terminology, which suggests a need for clearer definitions and HCI tools to make them explicit and usable. By clarifying these heuristics, this work provides practical insights for more systematic source selection in transfer learning.

Intuitions of Machine Learning Researchers about Transfer Learning for Medical Image Classification | SummarXiv | SummarXiv