📝 SummarXiv

Abstract

In many derivative-free optimization algorithms, a sufficient decrease condition decides whether to accept a trial step in each iteration. This condition typically requires that the potential objective function value decrease of the trial step, i.e., the true reduction in the objective function value that would be achieved by moving from the current point to the trial point, be larger than a multiple of the squared stepsize. When the objective function is stochastic, evaluating such a condition accurately can require a large estimation cost. In this paper, we frame the evaluation of the sufficient decrease condition in a stochastic setting as a hypothesis test problem and solve it through a sequential hypothesis test. The two hypotheses considered in the problem correspond to accepting or rejecting the trial step. This test sequentially collects noisy sample observations of the potential decrease until their sum crosses either a lower or an upper boundary depending on the noise variance and the stepsize. When the noise of observations is Gaussian, we derive a novel sample size result, showing that the effort to evaluate the condition explicitly depends on the potential decrease, and that the sequential test terminates early whenever the sufficient decrease condition is away from satisfaction. Furthermore, when the potential decrease is~$\Theta(\delta^r)$ for some~$r\in(0,2]$, the expected sample size decreases from~$\Theta(\delta^{-4})$ to~$O(\delta^{-2-r})$. We apply this sequential test sampling framework to probabilistic-descent direct search. To analyze its convergence rate, we extend a renewal-reward supermartingale-based convergence rate analysis framework to an arbitrary probability threshold. By doing so, we are able to show that probabilistic-descent direct search has an iteration complexity of $O(n/\epsilon^2)$ for gradient norm...