📝 SummarXiv

Abstract

In collaborative forecast projects, the combining of multiple probabilistic forecasts into an ensemble is standard practice, with linear pooling being a common combination method. The weighting scheme of a linear pool should be tailored to the specific research question, and weight selection is often performed via optimizing a proper scoring rule. This is known as optimal linear pooling. Besides optimal linear pooling, Bayesian predictive synthesis has emerged as a model probability updating scheme which is more flexible than standard Bayesian model averaging and which provides a Bayesian solution to selecting model weights for a linear pool. In many problems, equally weighted linear pool forecasts often outperform forecasts constructed using sophisticated weight selection methods. Thus regularization to an equal weighting of forecasts may be a valuable addition to any weight selection method. In this manuscript, we introduce an optimal linear pool based on a Gibbs posterior over stacked model weights optimized over a proper scoring rule. The Gibbs posterior extends stacking into a Bayesian framework by allowing for optimal weight solutions to be influenced by a prior distribution, and it also provides uncertainty quantification of weights in the form of a probability distribution. We compare ensemble forecast performance with model averaging methods and equal weighted models in simulation studies and in a real data example from the 2023-24 US Centers for Disease Control FluSight competition. In both the simulation studies and the FluSight analysis, the stacked Gibbs posterior produces ensemble forecasts which often outperform the ensembles of other methods.