📝 SummarXiv

Abstract

Fast-track procedures play an important role in the context of conditional registration of health products, such as conditional approval processes and listing processes for digital health applications. Fast-track procedures offer the potential for earlier patient access to innovative products. They involve two registration steps. The applicants can apply first for conditional registration. A successful conditional registration provides a limited funding or approval period and time to prepare the application for permanent registration, which is the second step of the registration process. For conditional registration, typically, products have to fulfil only a part of the requirements necessary for permanent registration. There is interest in valid and efficient study designs for fast-track procedures. This will be addressed in this paper. A motivating example of the paper is the German fast-track registration process of digital health applications (DiGA) for reimbursement by statutory health insurances. The main focus of the paper is the systematic investigation of the utility of adaptive designs in the context of fast-track registration processes. The paper also covers a careful discussion of the different requirements found in the guidelines and their consequences. We demonstrate that the use of adaptive designs in the context of fast-track processes like the DiGA registration process is, in most cases, much more efficient than the current standard of two separate studies. The results presented in this paper are based on numerical calculations supported by mathematical arguments.